Thursday, July 12, 2018 12:17 am
The New York Times strikes out
Really? Then why did this prestigious publication waste so much paper and ink on a June 25 front-page article about Bernie Sanders that was demonstrably untrue, not news and clearly unfit to print?
The piece claimed that the formidable presidential contender of 2016 has been a ballot box flop this year, failing to “expand his political base and propel his personal allies to victory in Democratic primaries.” Moreover, it took a slap at Our Revolution, the aggressively progressive grassroots political movement that sprang out of Senator Sanders’ presidential run. The Times scoffed that “fewer than 50 percent of the more than 80 candidates [OR] has endorsed have won elections this year.”
News flash for clueless media cognoscenti: Winning anywhere near half of your campaigns is a stunning achievement for a political organization! It’s all the more stunning that it’s being achieved by Senator Sanders and Our Revolution, for nearly all of the candidates they endorse are unconventional, first-time contenders who start out with no name recognition, no fat cat money and no support from establishment power brokers. I happen to be a board member of the upstart Our Revolution movement, so I know of these gutsy mavericks personally, and I’ve seen their surprisingly successful campaigns from the ground level. They are winning because they’re bringing political integrity and Bernie’s big policy ideas to voters hungry for both – and because, in less than two years, have organized hundreds of thousands of democratic populists into more than 600 active political networks all across the country, including grassroots organizing in red areas the party has long ignored.
Internet users who tap out angry, spur-of-the-moment emails and tweets are advised to pause, take a deep breath, and think before hitting that irreversible “send” button.
The same rule of thumb should guide major news organizations before they rush out with untrue stories. For example, The New York Times screed that prematurely pronounced the Our Revolution political organization a failure. “The group has repeatedly picked fights with the Democratic establishment in primary elections, losing nearly every time,” the paper barked in a Monday morning article.
Hold that thought! Hold that thought! The very next day, Our Revolution’s progressive candidate for governor in the Maryland primary, Ben Jealous, handily defeated the party establishment’s favorite. Also, in New York a 28-year-old Our Revolution activist, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, shocked the national party’s entire corporate hierarchy with her resounding grassroots victory over Rep. Joe Crowley, the fourth highest-ranking Democrat in the U.S. House.
These big scores followed OR’s earlier outsider victories over monied insiders in the Georgia and Texas gubernatorial primaries. Meanwhile, the insurgent group, which the Times ridiculed as “failing,” has also been winning dozens of upset victories in down-ballot primary elections from coast to coast. Indeed, the feisty progressive rebels of OR are already electing 40 percent of its candidates.
Just as significant, this Sanders-inspired progressive surge has now defined the Democratic Party’s agenda and enlivened both its supporters and many of its previously-moribund office holders who now backed such populist (and popular) proposals as Medicare For All and debt-free higher education.
Apparently, it’s hard to see America’s grassroots reality through the dusty-distant office windows of The New York Times. So, before the editors and writers send out another hit piece on the people and candidates of Our Revolution, maybe they could come out of their journalistic cubicles ... and at least visit the countryside.