Home / Articles / Features / Earth Talk / Earth Talk
Print this Article
Thursday, Dec. 8, 2005 06:57 am

Earth Talk

From the editors of E/The Environmental Magazine

Dear “Earth Talk”: What’s better for the environment, a fake or real Christmas tree?  — R.M. Brandt, Nutley, N.J.
Although there is no crystal-clear answer to the age-old “real vs. fake” Christmas-tree debate, most environmentalists, “tree-huggers” among them, would agree that real trees are the better choice, at least from a personal and public-health standpoint. Some might make a case for fake trees because they are reused every year and therefore don’t generate the waste of their real counterparts, but fake trees are made with polyvinyl chloride (otherwise known as vinyl), one of the most environmentally offensive forms of nonrenewable, petroleum-derived plastic. Furthermore, several known carcinogens, including dioxin, ethylene dichloride, and vinyl chloride, are generated during the production of PVC, polluting neighborhoods located near factory sites. Most of those factory sites are actually in China, where 85 percent of the fake trees sold in North America originate. Labor standards there don’t adequately protect workers from the dangerous chemicals they are handling. In addition to PVC, fake trees contain lead and other additives designed to make the otherwise rigid PVC more malleable. Unfortunately, many of these additives have been linked to liver, kidney, neurological, and reproductive-system damage in lab studies on animals. The Children’s Health Environmental Coalition warns that fake trees “may shed lead-laced dust, which may cover branches or shower gifts and the floor below the tree.” So heed the advice of the label on your fake tree telling you to avoid inhaling or eating any dust or parts that may come loose. The primary downside of real Christmas trees is that, because they are farmed as agricultural products, they often require repeated application of pesticides over their typical eight-year life cycles. Therefore, while they are growing — and then again once they are discarded — they may contribute to pollution of local watersheds. Beyond the runoff issue, the sheer numbers of trees that are discarded after every holiday can be a big waste issue for municipalities that aren’t prepared to mulch them for compost. The most eco-friendly way to enjoy a Christmas tree is to buy a live tree with its roots intact from a local grower and then replant it in your yard once the holiday has passed. However, because trees are dormant in the winter, live trees should spend no more than a week indoors, lest they “wake up” and begin to grow again in the warmth of your home. If this happens, there is a good chance that the tree will not survive once it is returned to the cold winter outdoors and replanted.
For more information: Children’s Health Environmental Coalition, www.checnet.org; About.com’s “How to Care for a Live Christmas Tree,” forestry.about.com/od/christmastrees1/ ht/living_x_tree.htm.
Send questions to “Earth Talk” in care of E/The Environmental Magazine, P.O. Box 5098, Westport, CT 06881; or e-mail earthtalk@emagazine.com.
Log in to use your Facebook account with
IllinoisTimes

Login With Facebook Account



Recent Activity on IllinoisTimes

Calendar

  • Mon
    20
  • Tue
    21
  • Wed
    22
  • Thu
    23
  • Fri
    24
  • Sat
    25
  • Sun
    26