Home / Articles / Features / Earth Talk / For the birds
Print this Article
Wednesday, April 18, 2007 02:33 pm

For the birds

Wind turbines may chop ’em up, but pollution is a real killer

Wind turbines may kill some birds, but industrial emissions kill many more.
Untitled Document Wind power turbines, some people say, pose a threat to birds, including migrating flocks. If this is true, what is being done about this?
It is ironic that nonpolluting, renewable wind energy, long touted as a potential savior in the fight to stop global warming, is getting a bad rap for killing wildlife. High-profile examples such as California’s Altamont Pass — where outdated, oversize wind turbines kill some 1,000 birds of prey each year — plague the growing wind-power industry, even though more modern, better-sited wind farms kill far fewer birds. According to a 2002 study of anthropogenic (human-caused) bird mortality conducted by researcher Wallace Erickson, birds face daily threats far more lethal than wind turbines. Erickson’s study found that between 500 million and 1 billion birds are killed annually in the United States alone when they strike manmade structures, including communications towers, buildings and windows, and power lines. Hunting, cat predation, pesticides, commercial fishing operations, oils spills, and cars and trucks also take a heavy toll. All of this should be remembered, say wind-power advocates, when the relative impact of windmills on bird populations is put in perspective: Contact with wind turbines represented less that 1 percent of the total number of human-caused bird deaths in Erickson’s study. There are, however, steps that can be taken in the construction of wind-power turbines to minimize their impact on birds. The American Bird Conservancy advises that lighting on turbines be minimized, that tension wires and lattice supports should be avoided, and that wind-turbine power lines be placed underground whenever possible. Already more modern wind towers are being designed in ways that prevent birds from perching on them (solving one of the problems with the Altamont Pass towers) — and the turbine blades rotate much more slowly than those in earlier designs. In addition, says the ABC, careful reviews of potential wind-turbine sites should be conducted. Known bird-migration pathways, areas where birds are highly concentrated, and landscapes known for their popularity with birds should be avoided “unless mortality risk has been analyzed and the likelihood of significant mortality has been ruled out.” Wind farms should be situated on already disturbed land, such as in agricultural areas, so as not to displace existing bird habitat or travel corridors. Sites should also be reviewed for use by birds listed under the Endangered Species Act. Ever-growing concerns about global warming and pollution from fossil-fuel use demand that we move as quickly as possible toward clean, renewable energy sources, even if they are as yet imperfect. “When you look at a wind turbine,” says John Flicker, president of the National Audubon Society, the world’s preeminent bird-advocacy organization, “you can find the bird carcasses and count them. With a coal-fired power plant you can’t count the carcasses, but it’s going to kill a lot more birds.” Indeed, according to Erickson, for every 10,000 birds killed by human activities, less than one death is caused by a wind turbine. And if greenhouse gases are not reduced significantly in the next decade, we could bear witness to a large number of plant and animal extinctions in the coming years.
For more information: American Bird Conservancy, www.abcbirds.org; American Wind Energy Association www.awea.org; National Audubon Society, www.audubon.org.
Send questions to Earth Talk, care of E/The Environmental Magazine, P.O. Box 5098, Westport, CT 06881 or e-mail earthtalk@emagazine.com.
Log in to use your Facebook account with

Login With Facebook Account

Recent Activity on IllinoisTimes


  • Thu
  • Fri
  • Sat
  • Sun
  • Mon
  • Tue
  • Wed


Saturday May 26th