Home / Articles / Features / Earth Talk / Tiny bubbles
Print this Article
Wednesday, Jan. 9, 2008 03:16 am

Tiny bubbles

How single-serving beverages are heating up the world

art4734
Untitled Document
Production of single-serving beverages generates millions of tons of greenhouse gases and other pollutants.
PHOTO COURTESY OF GETTY IMAGES

How much of an effect, if any, does the carbon dioxide in carbonated beverages have on global warming?
A typical 12-ounce can of soda contains as much as 6 grams (0.013 pounds) of carbon dioxide (CO2) gas, which either escapes into the atmosphere from the liquid on being opened or from your body after you consume the contents — so, yes, drinking carbonated beverages does contribute to your “carbon footprint,” but only ever so slightly. To provide some context, every time you burn a gallon of gas driving from point A to B in your car, about 20 pounds of carbon dioxide wafts skyward (if you find this hard to believe, go to the U.S. Department of Energy’s fuel-economy Web site, www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/co2.shtml). Extrapolating from that, a typical car commute to work produces more than 700 times the greenhouse gases that drinking that can of Coke does.
But cans and bottles of carbonated (or noncarbonated) drinks are still no friends of the environment. The production and distribution of single-serving beverages of all kinds generates untold millions of tons of greenhouse gases and other pollutants every year while also wasting billions of gallons of fresh water — and once the drinks have been consumed all those cans and plastic bottles have to go somewhere. Some communities are diligent enough to capture more than half of all such containers for recycling — an activity that itself generates significant amounts of greenhouse gases — but that still means that more than 40 billion cans are ending up in landfills each year or, even worse, as litter, according to data compiled by the nonprofit Container Recycling Institute. Each unrecycled can or bottle then must be replaced with an equivalent one made from virgin materials. The Container Recycling Institute reports that just the manufacture of these replacement aluminum cans each year generates about 3.5 million tons of greenhouse-gas emissions while also causing other environmental damage from the extraction of the bauxite from which aluminum is made. Even a larger amount of resources is used (petroleum-based in this case) and greenhouse gases emitted from the significant number of plastic single-serving drink bottles that are thrown away and not recycled each year. Consumers can take a bite out of all this resource waste and pollution by remembering that, first and foremost, water is the least costly and healthiest beverage of all (on virtually all personal and ecological counts). And water drawn from the kitchen faucet requires no disposable packaging or shipping to get there, thanks to the highly efficient water-delivery systems that have been in place in developed countries in the vast majority of communities for a very long time. For those who cannot get by without their soft drinks — carbonated or otherwise — the best way to lower that carbon footprint is to buy them in large containers and parse out servings in cups or glasses. A typical 2-liter (67.6-ounce) plastic soda bottle holds five-and-a-half times the liquid of a 12-ounce container and over four times that of a 16-ounce container, so it is easy to imagine the resource savings over time.
For more information: Container Recycling Institute, www.container-recycling.org, fueleconomy.gov, www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/co2.shtml.
Send questions to Earth Talk at P.O. Box 5098, Westport, CT 06881 or e-mail earthtalk@emagazine.com.
Log in to use your Facebook account with
IllinoisTimes

Login With Facebook Account



Recent Activity on IllinoisTimes

Calendar

  • Fri
    18
  • Sat
    19
  • Sun
    20
  • Mon
    21
  • Tue
    22
  • Wed
    23
  • Thu
    24