Home / Articles / Commentary / Letters to the Editor / Letters to the Editor 3/16/17
Print this Article
Thursday, March 16, 2017 12:17 am

Letters to the Editor 3/16/17



James Krohe’s March 2 column, “Absolutely ridiculous,” was exactly that. He made the laughable claim that “Immigrants, authorized and otherwise, are less likely to commit crimes than people born in the U.S., and crime rates tend to go down, not up, in places with lots of immigrants.” Excuse me, but has he watched the Chicago news lately? Check the crime rates in other Democrat-controlled cities with large immigrant populations and you will find the same. I moved from Chicago to Northwest Indiana where you will also find one of the highest immigrant populations and crime rates. Even the illegal immigrants don’t want to live in Chicago.

According to the American Immigration Council, 1.8 million immigrants lived in Illinois in 2013. More than half live in Chicago and other big cities – probably so they can work in the fields, don’t you think? Most of Illinois is a red state but big city immigrant votes keep Illinois firmly in the Democrat column.
When talking about so-called economic benefits of illegal immigration, studies usually include former immigrants who have become naturalized citizens, green card holders who are authorized to work and illegal aliens. The benefits from legal immigration far outweigh the pittance contributed by the illegal ones. Legal immigrants pay all their taxes, not just sales taxes.

Please, Illinois! Do not become a sanctuary state. What happens in Chicago doesn’t stay in Chicago. It bleeds downstate and into neighboring states like Indiana.

Cheree Calabro
Valpariso, Indiana

How can transgender soldiers negatively impact my military career? Quick answer: They can’t. Repealed June 2016, the ban on transgender persons in the U.S. military required individuals to hide certain characteristics about themselves.

Now that this barrier has been removed, transgender service members are able to participate openly without penalty. The removal of this ban can strengthen our force, increasing recruiting, retention and readiness by ensuring that these soldiers receive appropriate care for their mental and physical needs. How liberating it must be for these soldiers to feel comfortable and accepted in all facets.

Transgender persons may experience dysphoria, depression or diminished self-confidence. Medical professionals concurrently determine that sometimes it’s more effective to change the physical appearance than program the brain to attempt to handle the dissonance of how a person feels and what they see. If a medical doctor and psychiatrist approve a soldier for military duty, then who are we to argue?

The repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” and the inclusion of women in combat positions supports the mission of the Department of Defense to fill jobs with the most qualified person, regardless of gender or other dissimilarities. And let’s face it, transgender soldiers are already serving in the military. The repeal of this policy simply decriminalizes their gender change. Preventing an otherwise qualified population of people to serve in the armed forces can truly be a threat to national security if we fail to recognize the attributes reflected in individual differences.

Critics of this Department of Defense decision often claim that safety and harassment prevention are the primary reasons for opposition. Research has proven that sexual assault is a prevalent crime in all institutions among non-trans people. This should be acknowledged. And please, let’s give soldiers more credit. Although it is understandable that soldiers of a younger generation are generally more accepting of transgender persons, this does not mean that older or culturally deficient soldiers are incapable of changing or being educated.

I believe that advocacy for transgender rights in the military will be met with the similar reception and resistance as other inclusion policies, but that essentially, we will all benefit from the diversity, and appreciate that our leaders are forward thinkers. So, no, transgender soldiers won’t negatively impact my military career; they will enhance it.

If the U.S. military is to be an “instrument of social change” then we must be welcoming, all inclusive and reflective of our changing society. The U.S. Army is one of the most diverse organizations in the world and I hope we continue to keep it this way. There is no excuse for injustice and I believe that the repeal of the discriminatory Department of Defense transgender policy is another step in the right direction.

Doreen Misiorek


  • Thu
  • Fri
  • Sat
  • Sun
  • Mon
  • Tue
  • Wed